Shockingly, these nomenclatures did not go well with the masses. "Mr. Richmond is not a racist," they would tell me, "and Mr. Skinner is not a Criminal." They say these things as if I, and others, are not acutely aware that colloquial name calling is not fit for "our kind."
But let us examine the two individuals for their merits as holders of Praxis. Mr. Richmond is the clear favorite - he has the backing of the Prisci Council (who has just recently decided that they are now relevant) and most of the Covenants. Mr. Skinner, however, has tradition on his side - stepping in to fill the shoes of his own Covenant mate seems natural. His demeanor and attitude are also akin to someone who is comfortable managing a large group.
But both of them are willing to hand things out like candy in order to get their way, and that is something that just doesn't sit right with this Chicago native.
Bribery is a time honored tradition, but the moment you talk about it, it's no longer bribery. You don't hand someone an envelope, you bake them a pie. "My wife made this delicious pie for you and your family, I hope you enjoy it. Give me a call when you make a decision on those contracts." No mention of the envelope. At worst there might be a statement of "She made it with extra filling, just like you like it."
So it seems we are in a bit of bind, and we are left with the headlining question. Will this change be to our benefit, or to one of theirs. Is this for his honor, or for ours?
Sincerely,
J. C.
No comments:
Post a Comment